WebIn October 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its much anticipated decision in Smith v. Inco Limited.1The court, in its 70 page unanimous ruling, examined a number of fundamental issues commonplace in virtually all contaminated land litigation. We reported in a previous edition of Environewson the trial decision of Smith v. Web29 Nov 2011 · Smith v. Inco Limited, 2011 ONCA 628 (Doherty, MacFarland JJ.A., and Hoy J. ad hoc), October 7, 2011. This appeal considered a July 2010 class action trial judgment, in which the trial judge held that the soil on the properties in Port Colborne contained nickel particles deposited by emissions from Inco's nearby nickel refinery.
CanLII Connects - Smith v Inco Brief
Web1 Nov 2011 · On October 7, 2011 the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Smith v. Inco Limited, 2011 ONCA 628. The case was brought as a class proceeding by a … http://www.weirfoulds.com/pdf-article?id=2574 mohave co assessor\u0027s office
Environmental Class Actions for Historical …
WebFletcher, (1868) LR 3 HL 330, Smith v. Inco, 2011 ONCA 628, Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. Ontario (Transportation), 2013 SCC 13, Windsor v. Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., 2014 ABCA 108. Facts: Fraser Hillary’s Limited (“Fraser”) has operated a dry cleaning business since 1960. DH is the president and sole director of Fraser. Web22 Dec 2014 · Smith v Inco (2013 ONCA 724and 2011 ONCA 628) – The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant’s appeal of Justice Henderson’s cost award. In the 2011 Ontario Court of Appeal decision, the Court outlined two distinct branches of nuisance. The first involves material physical damage to property. The second is interference with the ... Web28 Nov 2014 · Smith v. Inco Limited, 2011 ONCA 628 (CanLII) Smith v Inco 2011 (ON CA) Facts: Claimants filed a claim in nuisance, because the defendant nickel factory was … mohave community college calendar